[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lib/54017: jemalloc deadlock?
The following reply was made to PR lib/54017; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
To: "gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: lib/54017: jemalloc deadlock?
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 16:23:10 -0800
> On Mar 9, 2019, at 4:10 PM, matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost> wrote:
> the multiple definition problem seems to indicate that joerg's
> idea of hiding the stats functions by default is going to be
> the right solution.
The only symbols exposed by the malloc library should be the ones =
described by the relevant standards we conform to. Any of the optional =
stuff specific to a particular malloc implementation should be relegated =
> all these crashes makes me think that new jemalloc should be
> reverted in -current and delayed until netbsd-9 happens, so
> that we have heaps of time to find all the issues, rather
> than shipping a damaged or delayed netbsd-9.
Main Index |
Thread Index |