[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers) mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)
The following reply was made to PR port-arm/53171; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
To: Jared McNeill <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, thorpej%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-arm/53171 (Broadcom (and other ARM SoC i2c drivers)
mis-handle indirect configuration of devices)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:48:51 +0200
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 02:33:32PM -0300, Jared McNeill wrote:
> Can this change be done in a way where we require explicit locators for
> attaching indirect child devices? I worry about driver probe functions
> sending crap over the i2c bus on boards where we've otherwise strictly
> defined devices in the DT.
This sounds similar to some sparc machines where we do strict direct
configuration for devices that OF knows about, but on some i2c buses
use indirect config (but I haven't been paying close attention so far).
Main Index |
Thread Index |