NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: misc/53145: Improved POSIX and X/OPEN conformance (/etc/rc.subr)



On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 3:20 AM, Robert Elz <kre%munnari.oz.au@localhost> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR misc/53145; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: misc/53145: Improved POSIX and X/OPEN conformance (/etc/rc.subr)
> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 14:16:43 +0700
>
>      Date:        Sun,  1 Apr 2018 04:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
>      From:        bruce.lilly%gmail.com@localhost
>      Message-ID:  <20180401044001.0628C7A212%mollari.NetBSD.org@localhost>
>
>    | Change of '-ax' to '-A' is reported on the NetBSD /bin/ps man page as equivalent
>
>  Yes, -ax and -A are the same and that can be changed.
>
>    | Change of '-o pid,command' to '-o pid,comm' is supported by NetBSD /bin/ps
>    | (although it is undocumented) and conforms to POSIX and X/OPEN standards.
>
>  It is documented (at least as far back as NetBSD 6) but does not mean the
>  same thing, NetBSD's "comm" is the same as the POSIX "comm", whereas
>  NetBSD's "command" is the same as POSIX "args" (which is also supported
>  on NetBSD as an alias for "command") so if  you can verify that changing it
>  from "pid,command" to "pid,args" works for you (with the heirloom version of
>  ps in use) I cannot see any reason we should not make that change.

It works for me (output same except for whitespace, which won't affect
operation):

root@e2500sa:/root# /bin/ps -p 1 -o pid,args
PID COMMAND
  1 init
root@e2500sa:/root# /usr/pkg/heirloom/bin/ps -p 1 -o pid,args
  PID COMMAND
    1 init
root@e2500sa:/root# /usr/pkg/heirloom/bin/posix/ps -p 1 -o pid,args
  PID COMMAND
    1 init
root@e2500sa:/root# /usr/pkg/heirloom/bin/posix2001/ps -p 1 -o pid,args
  PID COMMAND
    1 init
root@e2500sa:/root# /usr/pkg/heirloom/bin/s42/ps -p 1 -o pid,args
  PID COMMAND
    1 init

>  I doubt that a pullup to -6 or -7 is warranted though (and perhaps not even -8)
>
>  kre

FYI, I looked briefly at the version (1.100) of rc.subr in -current
(a.k.a. -8), and
I believe the patch should work for that version also [ultimately, the
script calls
ps via _find_processes either with -p <pid> or -A (-ax) in addition to
the output
(-o ...) args].



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index