Re: misc/52832: [htdocs] research: update/remove old links

[Eitan Adler <lists%eitanadler.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR misc/52832; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Eitan Adler <lists%eitanadler.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: leot%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: misc/52832: [htdocs] research: update/remove old links
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 06:07:31 -0800

 It is possible they are available via the web archive. I only looked
 to see if they had alternatives via Google. In terms of historical
 interest: doubtful. There are better sources for such information
 (e.g., scholar.google.com) .
 
 On 17 December 2017 at 05:50, Leonardo Taccari <leot%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR misc/52832; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Leonardo Taccari <leot%NetBSD.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: misc/52832: [htdocs] research: update/remove old links
 > Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 14:41:07 +0100
 >
 >  Hello Eitan,
 >
 >  lists%eitanadler.com@localhost writes:
 >  > >Number:         52832
 >  > >Category:       misc
 >  > >Synopsis:       [htdocs] research: update/remove old links
 >  > >Confidential:   no
 >  > >Severity:       non-critical
 >  > >Priority:       low
 >  > >Responsible:    misc-bug-people
 >  > >State:          open
 >  > >Class:          change-request
 >  > >Submitter-Id:   net
 >  > >Arrival-Date:   Sun Dec 17 01:05:00 +0000 2017
 >  > >Originator:     Eitan Adler
 >  > >Release:        =
 >
 >  > >Organization:
 >  > >Environment:
 >  > >Description:
 >  > Several links are old. Update them to modern references or remove them.
 >  >
 >  > (it's unclear we should keep this page at all, given it never gets updat=
 >  ed, and the research is old, but that's for a different discussion)
 >  > [...]
 >
 >  Are the links available via web.archive.org?
 >
 >  Regarding the page not getting updated or new possible new research of
 >  interest to NetBSD that isn't documented, sigh!. However, I think that
 >  the page can have an historical interest and probably it's better that
 >  it stays IMHO.
 >
 
 
 
 -- 
 Eitan Adler