NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/49017: vfork does not suspend all threads

To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/49017: vfork does not suspend all threads
From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 16:26:04 -0400

On Apr 5,  7:20pm, martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: kern/49017: vfork does not suspend all threads

|  Using vfork() in a program with multiple active threads is madness,
|  posix_spawn() is the only sensible way.

Why is that? We allow it, so it should do something reasonable/useful...
Or we should not allow it...

christos

References:
- Re: kern/49017: vfork does not suspend all threads
  - From: Martin Husemann

Prev by Date: NetBSD Nightly Trouble Ticket Report
Next by Date: Re: kern/49017: vfork does not suspend all threads
Previous by Thread: Re: kern/49017: vfork does not suspend all threads
Next by Thread: Re: kern/49017: vfork does not suspend all threads
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index