Re: kern/52111: wmX i82574L inoperative in monoprocessor mode (i386)

[Frank Kardel <kardel%netbsd.org@localhost>]

The other system
machdep.dmi.bios-vendor = American Megatrends Inc.
machdep.dmi.board-vendor = ASRock
machdep.dmi.board-product = 990FX Extreme9
uses ioapic for interrupts:

wm0 at pci6 dev 0 function 0: Intel i82572EI 1000baseT Ethernet (rev. 0x06)
wm0: interrupting at ioapic1 pin 23
wm0: PCI-Express bus
wm0: 2048 words (16 address bits) SPI EEPROM, version 5.11.8, Image 
Unique ID 0000ffff
wm0: Ethernet address 00:1b:21:aa:9b:7c
igphy0 at wm0 phy 1: Intel IGP01E1000 Gigabit PHY, rev. 0
igphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 
1000baseT-FDX, auto

wm1 at pci13 dev 0 function 0: Intel i82583V (rev. 0x00)
wm1: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 18
wm1: PCI-Express bus
wm1: 2048 words FLASH, version 1.10.0, Image Unique ID 0000ffff
wm1: Ethernet address bc:5f:f4:98:32:84
makphy0 at wm1 phy 1: Marvell 88E1149 Gigabit PHY, rev. 1
makphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 
1000baseT-FDX, auto

So we have differences in interrupt handling and chips and one setup is 
sensible to mono processor mode.

Best regards,
  Frank

On 03/26/17 09:55, Martin Husemann wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/52111; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: kern/52111: wmX i82574L inoperative in monoprocessor mode (i386)
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 09:52:37 +0200
>
>   On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 10:15:00PM +0000, kardel%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
>   > wm0: for LINK interrupting at msix0 vec 2
>   
>   On the other systems that do not show this issue, does the wm use msi?
>   
>   Martin
>