[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-sparc64/51925 (The sparc/sparc64 ports consider EM_SPARC32PLUS equivalent to EM_SPARCV9)
The following reply was made to PR port-sparc64/51925; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
To: Guillem Jover <guillem%debian.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: port-sparc64/51925 (The sparc/sparc64 ports consider
EM_SPARC32PLUS equivalent to EM_SPARCV9)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:14:03 +0100
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:47:55AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Thanks! But I see you only modified the sparc64 tree. A similar entry
> can be found in the sparc port, and although that one will just
> fall through to an error case (I assume), it seems confusing given the
> comment underneath.
That was dead code, I just removed it.
It is very unlikely we would ever see a COMPAT_NETBSD64 on 32bit sparc
Main Index |
Thread Index |