[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: port-mac68k/51923: /usr/libexec/cc1: Cannot allocate memory
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:55:01PM +0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR port-mac68k/51923; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)
> To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: port-mac68k/51923: /usr/libexec/cc1: Cannot allocate memory
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:52:07 +0000 (UTC)
> joerg%bec.de@localhost (Joerg Sonnenberger) writes:
> >Are there any inherent platform reasons for not using the same limits as
> >i386 by default? E.g. 256MB for MAXTSIZ, 3GB for data size and 64MB for
> Wouldn't that be silly? 256MB text with 128MB total address space?
Total address space or maximum physical memory? That's why I asked
whether there are platforms reasons for very tight limits.
Main Index |
Thread Index |