[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bin/51556: less(1) generates SIGTTOU if lacking a controlling terminal
The following reply was made to PR bin/51556; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: bin/51556: less(1) generates SIGTTOU if lacking a controlling
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:12:58 +0000
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:55:01AM +0000, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > Creating a new process group does not result in the process it invokes
> > not having a controlling terminal. Unless you mean it creates a new
> > session; but it doesn't:
> What I mean is that the command invoked by timeout(1) will end up in a
> process group that is different from the process group with the
> controlling terminal.
Ok, but that's something entirely different :-)
Anyway, less is not wrong. The problem is that timeout(1) is
manipulating job control incorrectly.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |