Re: kern/50150: wm(4) failure

[Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakahara%iij.ad.jp@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/50150; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakahara%iij.ad.jp@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
        netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, hf%spg.tu-darmstadt.de@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/50150: wm(4) failure
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:20:35 +0900

 Hi,
 
 On 2016/05/11 12:50, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/50150; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Masanobu SAITOH <msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
 >  gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
 >  Hauke Fath <hf%spg.tu-darmstadt.de@localhost>
 > Cc: msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: kern/50150: wm(4) failure
 > Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 12:45:46 +0900
 > 
 >  Hi.
 >  
 >  On 2016/05/10 22:20, Hauke Fath wrote:
 >  > The following reply was made to PR kern/50150; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >  >
 >  > From: Hauke Fath <hf%spg.tu-darmstadt.de@localhost>
 >  > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >  > Cc: kern-bug-people%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >  > Subject: Re: kern/50150: wm(4) failure
 >  > Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:18:50 +0200
 >  >
 >  >  On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:45:00 +0000 (UTC), Hauke Fath wrote:
 >  >  > =09Since the router had to come back up as quick as possible, we
 >  >  > =09did not take the time to check whether an 'ifconfig wm5 down ;
 >  >  > =09ifconfig wm5 up' could have brought the NIC back in line.
 >  >
 >  >  ... happened again during nightly backup traffic, and an 'ifconfig wm5=20
 >  >  down ; ifconfig wm5 up' did not fix it.
 >  >
 >  >  Any recent relevant changes to wm(4) that I could give a spin?
 >  
 >    Some people reported the same problem and the problem have not solved
 >  yet I think :-(
 
 I think if_wm.c:r1.397 might fix this problem. If you have time, Could
 you try if_wm.c:r1.397 or if_wm.c:r1.398 ?
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 -- 
 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
 
 Device Engineering Section,
 IoT Platform Development Department,
 Network Division,
 Technology Unit
 
 Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakahara%iij.ad.jp@localhost>