NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/50707: rm: fts_read: No such file or directory



The following reply was made to PR kern/50707; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?= <joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost>, 
	gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
	gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/50707: rm: fts_read: No such file or directory
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:25:06 -0500

 On Jan 25, 11:19pm, joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) wrote:
 -- Subject: Re: kern/50707: rm: fts_read: No such file or directory
 
 | Christos Zoulas a écrit :
 | > The following reply was made to PR kern/50707; it has been noted by GNATS.
 | >
 | > From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
 | > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
 | > 	gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 | > Cc:
 | > Subject: Re: kern/50707: rm: fts_read: No such file or directory
 | > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:02:15 -0500
 | >
 | >   On Jan 25, 10:00pm, joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost (joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost) wrote:
 | >   -- Subject: kern/50707: rm: fts_read: No such file or directory
 | >
 | >   Are you using log (WAPBL) with this filesystem?
 | 
 | 	I have tried with or without WAPBL with the same result. As I've never 
 | seen this issue on sparc64 (FC-AL disks with raidframe), I have 
 | suspected in a first time ataraid. Thus I have moved my ataraid 
 | configuration to a new raidframe configuration (raid1) and I've seen 
 | this issue again.
 | 
 | 	Thus with or without log, on ataraid or raidframe, system can corrupt a 
 | ffsv2 slice. I haven't tested with other filesystems like lfs or without 
 | raid.
 
 I am running with raidframe. Perhaps the problem is hardware. I would check
 the memory... The disks being at fault is less likely with raidframe.
 
 christos
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index