NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/50430: syscall_disestablish() can remove active syscalls
The following reply was made to PR kern/50430; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost>
To: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: kern/50430: syscall_disestablish() can remove active syscalls
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:08:42 +0900
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 8:25pm, mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost (matthew green) wrote:
> -- Subject: re: kern/50430: syscall_disestablish() can remove active syscalls
>
> | until bug is fixed, can we disable the autounload?
>
> Sure, that sounds prudent. It is difficult to fix properly. One way to do
> this would be to mark all lwps that have used compat syscalls with a bit
> depending on the module they have used, and refuse to unload the module
> until the lwp is gone.
>
> - when load a module that has compat syscalls, assign to it a bit.
> - mark a flags field of all syscalls that were loaded with that module
> with that bit.
> - or the lwp flags with the syscall flags on each syscall.
> - when it is time to unload check that no lwp has that bit in the flags set.
> - instead of keeping l_sysent, keep l_sysmodflags or something.
What happens if signal handler does longjmp(3) and interrupted syscall
never returns?
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index