NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: PR/49816 CVS commit: src/libexec/ld.elf_so
The following reply was made to PR lib/49816; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: PR/49816 CVS commit: src/libexec/ld.elf_so
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 20:16:22 +0200
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 04:45:01PM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR lib/49816; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: yamt%netbsd.org@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc: lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
> yamt%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: PR/49816 CVS commit: src/libexec/ld.elf_so
> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 16:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
>
> > The following reply was made to PR lib/49816; it has been noted by GNATS.
> >
> > From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
> > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> > Cc: lib-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
> > netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, yamt%NetBSD.org@localhost
> > Subject: Re: PR/49816 CVS commit: src/libexec/ld.elf_so
> > Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 18:22:21 +0200
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 04:10:02PM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > > except that:
> > > * _rtld_exclusive_exit doesn't use CAS
> > > * this code is MI
> > >
> > > i agree that something like PTHREAD__ATOMIC_IS_MEMBAR
> > > would be a nice optimization, though.
> >
> > So which platform are you worried about that doesn't have TSO and
> > doesn't implicit membars for CAS? I'm asking because the only reason
> > those changes should help your problem is if they massively penalize the
> > operation.
>
> well, can you explain why _rtld_exclusive_exit is safe
> without cas or barrier?
All sane MP platforms at least implement Total Store Ordering. So all
unrelated stores are visible no later than the reset of the mutex.
That's why I am surprised that it changes anything at all for you.
Joerg
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index