Re: Re: lib/49387: erfl and erfcl missing

["Kai-Uwe Eckhardt" <kuehro%gmx.de@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR lib/49387; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Kai-Uwe Eckhardt" <kuehro%gmx.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Re: lib/49387: erfl and erfcl missing
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:23:17 +0100

 >  Yes, but it is more complicated than that. 
 
 Yes I know, and I really think the world doesn't need long double. People
 should think about their algorithms before using it and about the performance
 penalty. But since it is part of the standards, programs like gcc and R complain
 about missing functions. 
 
 Thanks for all your work on the long double complex functions by the way, it
 really helped to reduce test failures in gcc.
 
 Kai-Uwe