NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/49207

The following reply was made to PR kern/49207; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Kamil Rytarowski" <>
Subject: Re: kern/49207
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 22:55:00 +0200

 Quick questions to make it clear:
 1. Just to be sure. Is the extraction of these constants from clock_subr.h a good idea?
 2. After changing the macro names to longer forms. Is it a good idea to add compatibility defines in clock_subr.h? This way:
 3. Can I assume that with going back for the multiplication convention a user knows seconds per day (to be honest I never remembered it before :-) ). In other words, is the anti-16-bit-int campaign desired? Actually I believe that a good compiler will catch overflow immediately (clang, gcc).
 Thank you.
 With regards,

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index