[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646
The following reply was made to PR lib/48427; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 01:13:34 +0100
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:00:01PM +0000, Martin Husemann wrote:
> You may use any of the encodings you list above for multibyte character
> sequences, but you will always get full 32bit unicode for wchar_t.
> At least on NetBSD.
No, you won't necessarily get that. That's why we don't set the macro
either. The internal encoding of wchar_t for a given locale is exactly
that -- an encoding detail. We do provide a few basic promises, but
that's about it.
Main Index |
Thread Index |