Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646

To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, lib-bug-people%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646
From: Yuri <yuri%rawbw.com@localhost>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 01:51:57 -0800

On 12/07/2013 01:45, Thomas Klausner wrote:

  I don't know much about this stuff, but I can easily imagine that
  wchar_t always contains UCS and that there is a translation layer
  between the user-visible encoding and the one in wchar_t.

Please read the Wikipedia article:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_characterIt talks in detail about wchar_t definition. There is no directrelationship between wchar_t and UCS.


Yuri

References:
- Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646
  - From: Thomas Klausner

Prev by Date: Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646
Next by Date: Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646
Previous by Thread: Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646
Next by Thread: Re: lib/48427: libedit shouldn't require ISO 10646
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index