Re: kern/48058: bge(4) stops working after booting 5.2_STABLE

[Havard Eidnes <he%uninett.no@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/48058; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Havard Eidnes <he%uninett.no@localhost>
To: msaitoh%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/48058: bge(4) stops working after booting 5.2_STABLE
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:23:06 +0200 (CEST)

 >  Well, at the moment the machine is sitting there waiting for
 >  people to arrive at work tomorrow morning (in 12 hours time or
 >  so) for the power button to be pressed twice.
 
 Power reset has now been done.
 
 This time, bge0's phy found its media connections, but bge1
 (where the cable is inserted) still didn't(!)  Grep'ing for brg
 and bge now gave me (with the 5.1_STABLE kernel):
 
 bge0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: Broadcom BCM5721 Gigabit Ethernet
 bge0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 16
 bge0: ASIC BCM5750 B1 (0x4101), Ethernet address 00:11:25:22:6c:8e
 bge0: setting short Tx thresholds
 brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 1000BASE-T media interface, rev. 0
 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
 bge1 at pci5 dev 0 function 0: Broadcom BCM5721 Gigabit Ethernet
 bge1: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 17
 bge1: ASIC BCM5750 B1 (0x4101), Ethernet address 00:11:25:22:6c:8f
 bge1: setting short Tx thresholds
 brgphy1 at bge1 phy 1: BCM5750 1000BASE-T media interface, rev. 0
 brgphy1: no media present
 
 I've asked to have the cable moved to the bge0 connector.
 
 I would have expected brgphy0 to also support 1000baseT, though...
 
 >  But, sure, if it comes up again after a power cycle, I guess it
 >  won't hurt too much to also test a -current kernel.
 >
 >  Or, better yet, I'll dig out a similar machine from storage and
 >  test on it instead...
 
 I'll do the latter.  We have more-or-less identical machines
 sitting on a shelf, unpowered.
 
 Regards,
 
 - H=E5vard