NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/47748: Invalid file on ffs
On Aug 4, 6:22pm, David Holland wrote:
}
} The following reply was made to PR kern/47748; it has been noted by GNATS.
}
} From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
} To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
} Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:12:54 +0000
}
} On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Fr?d?ric Fauberteau wrote:
} > > > root@trashware:~$ rm /usr/pkgsrc/ham/tfkiss/pkg/CVS/K+^F
} > > > rm: /usr/pkgsrc/ham/tfkiss/pkg/CVS/K+: No such file or directory
} > >
} > > You could 'ls -li' the file, note the inode, then "shutdown now" to
} > > single user mode, umount(8) the file system, clri(8) the inode, then
} > > fsck(8) -fp the file system, and reboot.
} >
} > I could not 'ls -li' the file since syscalls failed on it. But I should
} > try a fsck in single user mode before submitting PR. It does not
} > enlighten me on what was the problem with this file but it corrects the
} > fs.
}
} It looks to me like it was probably four (or maybe more) characters
} long with a zero byte as the fourth character. There is no way to name
Except that it should be impossible to create such a file no
matter what an application does. If a zero byte were to ever appear in
a filename it would represent a serious bug in the filesystem code or
memory corruption.
} (Without the zero byte, you'd probably have been able to name the file
} with autocompletion, and ls -l would have worked. Although I remember
} once a long time ago accidentally getting a file with a newline in its
} name, which turned out to be surprisingly hard to get rid of. I think
} I ended up needing to write a C program that called unlink(2).)
I had a situation once where a filename had a "/" in it. Under
normal conditions this would be impossible. The situation arose as the
machine was an NFS server, and the client was a Mac. MacOS used ":" as
a path seperator, so a "/" had no special meaning to it. My solution
was to clri and fsck as somebody else suggested. This happened around
1992 give or take a year. I would hope that this wouldn't be able to
happen with a modern system. I don't recall which machine it was on
now, but the server was running either SunOS 4.x or Ultrix 3/4 (VAX).
}-- End of excerpt from David Holland
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index