NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/47069: posix_spawn/t_spawnattr locks up the system



The following reply was made to PR kern/47069; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Julio Merino <julio%meroh.net@localhost>
To: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, martin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
        netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/47069: posix_spawn/t_spawnattr locks up the system
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:29:30 -0400

 On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Christos Zoulas 
<christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
 > On Oct 17,  8:16pm, julio%meroh.net@localhost (Julio Merino) wrote:
 > -- Subject: Re: kern/47069: posix_spawn/t_spawnattr locks up the system
 >
 > | On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Christos Zoulas 
 > <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
 > | >  Try defining FULL ok kern_mutex.c for powerpc.
 > |
 > | Nope, nothing.  I'm assuming that you meant to just "#define FULL" in
 > | kern_mutex.c?  I also tried enabling LOCKDEBUG and DIAGNOSTIC.
 >
 > Yes.
 >
 > | However, I noticed one more data point: when the system locks up, one
 > | of the t_spawnattr processes is in RUN state and the other in STOP
 > | state.  Both show 0K of memory in the SIZE and RES columns of top.
 >
 > Fine, but the whole problem could be a mutex issue. Let's try this
 > one first.
 
 By "this one" you meant defining FULL, LOCKDEBUG or DIAGNOSTIC?  I
 already tried them all and none provided any further details :-/
 
 -- 
 Julio Merino / @jmmv
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index