Re: misc/18120: rc.d scripts should report if command is missing or not executabale

[Julian Fagir <gnrp%komkon2.de@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR misc/18120; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Julian Fagir <gnrp%komkon2.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: misc/18120: rc.d scripts should report if command is missing or
 not executabale
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:34:17 +0200

 --Sig_/VNaaSNXyFKxczhFCoR5Y=HB
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Anyway, why isn't it considered a failure if the program is not executable
 (`return 0` afterwards)?
 And: Why does run_rc_command just return in most cases, but exits in case of
 non-existing pidfiles?
 
 --Sig_/VNaaSNXyFKxczhFCoR5Y=HB
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iEYEARECAAYFAk/okwkACgkQc7h7cu1Hpp4pTACbBseP6lWvsNTQd+7kYL7l6Th3
 vXcAoI2SUZU0FPUU9mLZ02RoOLr5vuIR
 =BX3K
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --Sig_/VNaaSNXyFKxczhFCoR5Y=HB--