[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
The following reply was made to PR kern/46509; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost>
Subject: Re: kern/46509
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:35:35 +0100
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:10:07PM +0000, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/46509; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: Jukka Ruohonen <jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: kern/46509
> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 19:05:11 +0300
> Can you try setting hw.acpi.cpu.dynamic to zero. Otherwise there is not
> really anything in acpicpu(4) that can cause this. (the idle-loop is 100 %
> the same as without it.)
I measure the performance before loading the "acpicpu" module, after
loading the module and after setting "hw.acpi.cpu.dynamic" to "0".
There was not dramatic change.
The reboot must have fixed some other weird problem.
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Main Index |
Thread Index |