[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: standards/46223: reserved identifier violation
The following reply was made to PR standards/46223; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Klaus Klein <kleink%kleink.org@localhost>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring%web.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: standards/46223: reserved identifier violation
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:52:46 +0200
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 06:30:48PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > It's rather hard to tell which problem you are attempting to solve,
> > as far as NetBSD is concerned - hence some of the delay in responding.
> I dare to point out open issues in the standard-compliant
> application of C/C++ naming conventions.
This sentence of yours is the quintessence of what makes the trail
of this PR so puzzling, at least as far as I'm concerned.
In addition, initially you reported the use of implementation-reserved
identifier names in headers which would be part of the implementation
(of POSIX, to be fair); subsequently you suggested a list of header
files which are for the most part private to the respective
applications or libraries residing in the same leaves of the source
tree. The former isn't a bug; the latter has a different scope
and would be an issue only to those attempting to turn those
directories' contents into conforming applications.
Please submit issues (included fixes are appreciated, too) in new
problem reports, or take further discussion to one of our tech
lists; the bug database isn't the right place for this.
Main Index |
Thread Index |