[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
The following reply was made to PR misc/46182; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
Cc: misc-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gson%gson.org@localhost (Andreas
Subject: re: toolchain/46182
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:56:12 +1100
> The following reply was made to PR misc/46182; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Cc: martin%duskware.de@localhost, tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost
> Subject: Re: toolchain/46182
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:44:24 +0900
> > - add more exceptions to the script, so it creats executable scripts
> > needed
> > - make sure the whole build does not need to invoke any shell script as
> > direct command (but use "sh $script" instaed)
> IIRC some Makefiles pre-generated by autoconf invoke scripts as
> direct command, and it's a bit annoying to fix third party distributions
> which may require specific autoconf versions.
in this case i have absolutely no objections to simply patching the
configure script (and the ignored configure.in, of course) directly.
Main Index |
Thread Index |