[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:40:38AM -0500, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> On 12-02-11 07:50 AM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >it's not a duplicate of kern/45093: kern/45093 is a real kernel
> Is it possible that kern/45609 is related to kern/45093?
No, I don't think so. PR kern/45093 caused kernel hangs, not crashes.
It could be a bge(4) bug in which case trying a NetBSD 5.1_STABLE
snapshot (and *not* 5.1.2) might be worth a try.
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Main Index |
Thread Index |