[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/44002: 3ware 9690 (ld driver) doesn't respond after transfer big amount of data
The following reply was made to PR kern/44002; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jiri Novotny <novotny%ics.muni.cz@localhost>
Cc: kern-bug-people%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost,
Subject: Re: kern/44002: 3ware 9690 (ld driver) doesn't respond after
transfer big amount of data
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:10:09 +0100
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:45:04AM +0000, Jiri Novotny wrote:
> > Hmm, I don't think that it is just issue of unclean system.
> > To be sure I made new filesystem: newfs -O2 -s -64m dk0
> > I havo no data on the RAID yet, so I don't need to play with fsck.
> > The behavior is still the same. New screenshots are here:
> > http://idril.ics.muni.cz/crash-screenshot.clear/
> Ok, that's definitely broken; if it persists after merging the other
> fix please file a new PR, as it's almost certainly a FS bug and not a
> driver issue.
I aplied the 126.96.36.199 patch, the behavior is still the same. I will double
check if I did'nt make a mistake and prepare new report.
> > > Also, if you're using wapbl and don't have this change:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > you'll probably want to pull it in. It's been pulled up to the
> > > 5.x branches so "cvs update" should get it for you without any
> > > hassle.
> > It is little bit issue for me. It needs kernel with vfs_wapbl.c
> > r1.38. I tried the change this in 5.1RC4, but it needs another
> > file - sys/wapbl_replay.h, O.K. I load it as well, but there were
> > bunch of bugs when I tried to compile the kernel.
> Ah, sorry, you want the change, not the whole of version 1.38. The
> version you want is 188.8.131.52 (for 5.1_STABLE) or 184.108.40.206.2.1 (for
> 5.1.0_PATCH) or 220.127.116.11.2.1 (for 5.0.2_PATCH).
> Or you can apply the patch yourself by doing
> cvs update -j1.37 -j1.38 vfs_wapbl.c
> but this will probably require you to hand-edit conflicts in the rcsid
> > I downloaded the new 5.1, but the wapbl is the same as in 5.1RC4.
> Yeah, unfortunately that fix didn't make it into 5.1.
> David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |