[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lib/43310: dirent(5) standard compliance
The following reply was made to PR lib/43310; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jukka Ruohonen <jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost>
Subject: Re: lib/43310: dirent(5) standard compliance
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 18:05:40 +0300
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:55:03PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> | Change the size, if there is no compelling reason not to; otherwise close
> | the bug report.
> Why not change NAME_MAX?
That is one possibility, yes.
As for the other issue, I am not entirely sure anymore whether what I wrote
makes sense in terms of portability. (Provided that the fixed size array
does not prompt someone to, say, apply sizeof() instead strlen() to d_name,
provided that d_namlen is not standardized.)
Main Index |
Thread Index |