[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/41668 (MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD builds)
The following reply was made to PR kern/41668; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost>
To: Andrew Doran <ad%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, tron%NetBSD.org@localhost,
Subject: Re: kern/41668 (MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:27:21 -0500
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:14:26AM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:23:13AM +0000, tron%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
> > Synopsis: MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD builds
> > (...)
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: tron%NetBSD.org@localhost
> > State-Changed-When: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:23:13 +0000
> > State-Changed-Why:
> > The MONOLITHIC is now built by default and distributed with snapshots.
> > This should probably be undone after the release of NetBSD 6.0 if the
> > problems with the module framework have been fixed in the meantime.
> This should definitely be undone. It confuses the needs of the producers
> of the product with the needs of the consumers of the product.
Cannot mount sense in root argument.
Choose different root argument or explain, pls [?] :
Main Index |
Thread Index |