[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/41668 (MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD builds)
The following reply was made to PR kern/41668; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Doran <ad%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: tron%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
Subject: Re: kern/41668 (MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:26 +0000
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:23:13AM +0000, tron%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
> Synopsis: MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD builds
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: ad->tron
> Responsible-Changed-By: tron%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Responsible-Changed-When: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:23:13 +0000
> I'll handle this PR.
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: tron%NetBSD.org@localhost
> State-Changed-When: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:23:13 +0000
> The MONOLITHIC is now built by default and distributed with snapshots.
> This should probably be undone after the release of NetBSD 6.0 if the
> problems with the module framework have been fixed in the meantime.
This should definitely be undone. It confuses the needs of the producers
of the product with the needs of the consumers of the product. If the
user base is so insignficant that these two sets of people are one and the
same, then it's appropriate. That would be rather sad.
Main Index |
Thread Index |