NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-amd64/42128: page fault trap installing NetBSD/amd64 5.0.1 under Xen



The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/42128; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: port-amd64-maintainer%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost,
        netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, reed%reedmedia.net@localhost
Subject: Re: port-amd64/42128: page fault trap installing NetBSD/amd64 5.0.1 
under Xen
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:31:41 +0200

 On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 06:30:04PM +0000, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/42128; it has been noted by 
 > GNATS.
 > 
 > From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: port-amd64/42128: page fault trap installing NetBSD/amd64 5.0.1
 >  under Xen
 > Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:27:43 -0500 (CDT)
 > 
 >  On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 >  
 >  > > Installing as a Xen guest using the amd64cd-5.0.1.iso.  When it
 >  > > got to the untar step in sysinst (extracting kern-GENERIC.tgz), it
 >  > > aborted with:
 >  > 
 >  > Is it a PV guest or a HVM guest ?
 >  
 >  Sorry, I do not know. I do not know what this means. How can I check?
 
 Did you use one of the netbsd-XEN* kernel ? Of a plain amd64 kernel ?
 
 >  
 >  > > kernel: page fault trap, code=0
 >  > > Stopped in pid 0.4 (system) at  0xffffffff804f163e:    repe insl      
 >  > > %dx,%es:(%rdi)
 >  > > db{0}> bt
 >  > > ?() at 0xffffffff804f163e
 >  > > ?() at 0xffffffff804fefc7
 >  > > ?() at 0xffffffff802c3207
 >  > > ?() at 0xffffffff804e0e4d
 >  > > ?() at 0xffffffff80105a4f
 >  > > Bad frame pointer: 0xffff800001215ac40
 >  > 
 >  > Also what is the message just before the page fault ? Did it start
 >  > userland at this point ?
 >  
 >  Sorry, I do not know of any previous message.
 >  
 >  Yes, userland was running. sysinst was running. I had been using it. It 
 >  failed after a few minutes when it got to the tar ball extraction step. 
 >  (Same as the Jan 2008 report.)
 
 OK.
 
 -- 
 Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
      NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
 --
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index