[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: port-sparc64/38949 (under emul_netbsd32 on sparc64 some applications die with segfault)
The following reply was made to PR port-sparc64/38949; it has been noted by
From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
To: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Subject: re: port-sparc64/38949 (under emul_netbsd32 on sparc64 some
applications die with segfault)
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 07:42:47 +1000
On May 19, 7:05am, mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: port-sparc64/38949 (under emul_netbsd32 on sparc64 some
| hmm, what happens if you don't have /emul/netbsd32? ie, just copy
| those /bin/ksh or /bin/sh files somewhere and run them as is.
| /emul/netbsd32 is probably going to be going away as being used.
| i haven't really thought deeply about this, but, i don't want to
| keep two methods of 32 bit support around and the new one is much
| better, so it's likely this will disappear.
Static binaries are not supported then. Not that I will miss them but...
Linux provides both.
BTW, i tested a static /bin/sh (actually /rescue/sh) and it worked fine.
Main Index |
Thread Index |