[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/39349 (cpu affinity can make lwps non-schedulable)
> State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
> State-Changed-By: rmind%NetBSD.org@localhost
> State-Changed-When: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:32:24 +0000
> Problem is clear, quick fix is commited. Decision what to do with already
> bound threads should be made to make a full fix.
Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost> wrote:
> Probably need to prevent binding to CPUs that have been taking
> offline. But what to do about CPUs that already have bound threads
> (which is all of them, of course). Perhaps we need to make note when
> an LWP has taken a lock?
Perhaps disallow (return EBUSY) changing of CPU state to offline, while there
are bound threads? What do you think?
Main Index |
Thread Index |