Re: bin/39535: groff -mdoc interprets C as markup inside a .Bd -literal .Ed block

["Stathis Kamperis" <ekamperi%gmail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR bin/39535; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Stathis Kamperis" <ekamperi%gmail.com@localhost>
To: uwe%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: bin/39535: groff -mdoc interprets C as markup inside a .Bd 
-literal .Ed block
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:48:55 +0300

 >The following reply was made to PR bin/39535; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 >From: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <uwe%netbsd.org@localhost>
 >To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >Cc:
 >Subject: Re: bin/39535: groff -mdoc interprets C as markup inside a .Bd 
 >-literal .Ed block
 >Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:30:52 +0400
 >
 >I don't see that.  Have you ruled out the following:
 
 Have a look here:
 http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?fileassoc++NetBSD-current
 
 Look at the EXAMPLES section in the printf() calls. They are:
 printf("Myhook: Removing entry for file.0);
 printf("Myhook: Could not add ACL.0);
 printf("Myhook: Denying access based on ACL decision.0);
 printf("Myhook: Error occurred during fileassoc removal.0);
 
 >. catpage is out of date?
 >
 >. terminal setting are broken (wrong number of lines) and man doesn't
 >show you complete text of the manpage?
 >
 > -uwe
 
 I haven't checked upon these. I'll do it tomorrow afternoon, when I get home,
 as there is no netbsd box here available.
 
 Thanks for bothering
 
 Best regards,
 Stathis Kamperis