[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/36870 (FAST_IPSEC cannot handle optional SA -> busy loop)
it took a long time, but now I've had some time and a machine to test it ...
Sorry for the long delay, but I've had a lot of other trouble here ...
I've retrieved a complete current version, compile and install it on an
The problem seems to be fixed. No problem occurred anymore.
Please pull up the fix into the next possible release.
Thanks in advance.
PS. While settup up the test, I was wondering a little bit, that in no
kernel config of the current version the FAST_IPSEC option is included
or even introduced in a comment. Also only in very few kernel setups
IPSEC is enabled - e.g. in no amd64 config at all.
Does nobody else use it?
Hi to all,
I've had a look at the diffs and they look OK compared to the version
actually running on our machines.
We are running a modified version of the FAST_IPSEC code in the
NetBSD4.0 Release in a productive manner here, so it is not possible to
just take the new implementation (or some fixes) and try it. (This
report was not the only misbehaviour of the FAST_IPSEC code.)
I will adapt the changes as soon as I can do into our source base, but
this may take some weeks, because I'm very busy at the moment.
If this is OK, I come back to you when I've finished testing.
Zitat von degroote%NetBSD.org@localhost:
Synopsis: FAST_IPSEC cannot handle optional SA -> busy loop
State-Changed-When: Sat, 03 May 2008 21:55:55 +0000
A fix has been commited. Can you confirm that it solves your issue ?
Main Index |
Thread Index |