Re: misc/18258 (etc/openssl/private should be private by default)

To: jmmv%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, lukem%NetBSD.org@localhost, jmmv%hispabsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: misc/18258 (etc/openssl/private should be private by default)
From: lukem%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:23:14 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: etc/openssl/private should be private by default

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: lukem%narn.netbsd.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:23:14 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
I think that the default should change to 0700, as per this PR>
Other systems have /etc/openssl/private (or equivalent) set to 0700,
and it makes sense to me.
We don't have to follow the permissions or layout of the original
("upstream") if they aren't sensible in our world order...

Prev by Date: Re: bin/34150 login class limits are always those of 'default' class
Next by Date: Re: bin/35630 (ftp may die with "Alarm clock" during file transfer)
Previous by Thread: Re: misc/18258 (etc/openssl/private should be private by default)
Next by Thread: Re: misc/18258 (etc/openssl/private should be private by default)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index