Subject: Re: lib/37473 (Statically linked executables are much larger in -current)
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org <gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/04/2007 09:31:43
And we know for a fact that's the problem? A link map would be useful.
Of course, it's not clear that we should care that much about this
problem. IMO, we should de-support statically-linked binaries (and
make the .a versions optional installs).
On Dec 4, 2007, at 8:44 AM, email@example.com wrote:
> Synopsis: Statically linked executables are much larger in -current
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: toolchain-manager->ad
> Responsible-Changed-By: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:44:56 +0000
> ad imported jemalloc.