Subject: Re: port-shark/22355 [was CVS commit: src/sys/nfs]
To: None <,,>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 07/30/2007 10:10:05
The following reply was made to PR port-shark/22355; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Julio M. Merino Vidal" <>
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <>
Subject: Re: port-shark/22355 [was CVS commit: src/sys/nfs]
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:06:37 +0200

 On 30/07/2007, at 11:13, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
 > On 30/07/2007, at 2:10, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
 >>> Any idea about what happens?
 >> hardclock without softintr_schedule is broken?
 > Seems to be the cause.  If I make "needsoftclock" be always true in  
 > kern_timeout.c:callout_hardclock, the machine works fine.   
 > Similarly, adding "_setsoftintr(0)" just after the call to hardclock 
 > () from clockintr() does the same.
 > Otherwise, at some point the machine seems to stop receiving  
 > interrupts: not even clockintr is called.  See my last reply to the  
 > PR.
 Another data point: making clockintr happen at IPL_HIGH instead of  
 IPL_CLOCK (by changing its isa_intr_establish call) makes the thing  
 work too.
 Julio M. Merino Vidal <>