The following reply was made to PR kern/32166; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv84@gmail.com>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/32166
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:04:11 +0100

 >        2. in the case of !PGO_LOCKED, uvn_get ignores PGO_DONTCARE,
 >           while uao_get honours it.
 
 Isn't that reversed?  I mean, it should be PGO_LOCKED because  AFAICS
 from uao_get, PGO_DONTCARE is honored in the PGO_LOCKED case (at least
 in uvm_aobj.c:951, v1.82).
 
 -- 
 Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84@gmail.com>
 The Julipedia - http://julipedia.blogspot.com/