Subject: Re: bin/33923: slattach(8) can't attach sl(4) interface
To: None <gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, firstname.lastname@example.org,>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 07/06/2006 12:19:49
On Jul 6, 3:40pm, firstname.lastname@example.org (Izumi Tsutsui) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: bin/33923: slattach(8) can't attach sl(4) interface
| The following reply was made to PR bin/33923; it has been noted by GNATS.
| From: Izumi Tsutsui <email@example.com>
| To: firstname.lastname@example.org
| Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
| Subject: Re: bin/33923: slattach(8) can't attach sl(4) interface
| Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 00:39:06 +0900
| email@example.com wrote:
| > | > | slattach: TIOCSETD: Device not configured
| > | > ifconfig sl0 create?
| > | Umm, you are right.
| > | I'll note about it sl(4) and slattach(8) man pages...
| > The question is: Should we just document this as you suggest, or should
| > we make the creation/deletion automatic in slattach?
| Well, I'd prefer the latter, but I can do only the former
| because I don't have a good idea how to modify slattach
| to create interfaces automatically. Currently it doesn't
| take an interface name arg.
Right, unlike pppd I don't think that slattach has a way to tell bind to
slX, or even find what you are bound. So let's fix the man page, for now.