Subject: Re: bin/31120 (update openssl in 3beta)
To: None <gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, zafer@gmx.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 06/07/2006 23:15:05
The following reply was made to PR bin/31120; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: christos@zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, zafer@gmx.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/31120 (update openssl in 3beta)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 19:12:41 -0400
On Jun 7, 11:00pm, woods@weird.com ("Greg A. Woods") wrote:
-- Subject: Re: bin/31120 (update openssl in 3beta)
| That seems like a very much less than ideal approach to maintenance.
|
| People will no doubt be running systems built from the NetBSD-3 branch
| in production for years yet to come, and for something as central to
| many security-related applications as OpenSSL is, it would seem
| important to keep it as up to date as possible in _all_ supported
| branches.
Greg, what version is running on 3.0? Are there any known vulnerabilities
against it? The problem is that openssl is such a large package, and it
affects other things (ssh), so we have to weigh the risk/benefit of the
upgrade.
christos