The following reply was made to PR bin/33244; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Onat ISIK" <onatto@gmail.com>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/33244
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:52:18 +0300

 I see... thank you.
 
 On 4/12/06, Nino Dehne <ndehne@gmail.com> wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR bin/33244; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Nino Dehne <ndehne@gmail.com>
 > To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: bin/33244
 > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:50:10 +0200
 >
 >  Hi,
 >
 >  I think there is a fundamental difference between ordinary random-access
 >  filesystems and ISO9660.
 >
 >  ISO9660 is not meant to be written to randomly. Instead, a filesystem im=
 age
 >  must be constructed in one go from existing files, which is what mkisofs
 >  (and lately makefs) does.
 >
 >  As such, a tool like newfs_cd9660 really makes no sense IMHO.
 >
 >  Best regards,
 >
 >  ND
 >
 >