The following reply was made to PR kern/32874; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Peter Postma <peter@pointless.nl>
To: Nino Dehne <ndehne@gmail.com>
Cc: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/32874: pf(4)'s route-to feature is not working properly, checksum errors
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:59:44 +0100

 On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 12:50:02PM +0000, Nino Dehne wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/32874; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Nino Dehne <ndehne@gmail.com>
 > To: Peter Postma <peter@pointless.nl>
 > Cc: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 > Subject: Re: kern/32874: pf(4)'s route-to feature is not working properly, checksum errors
 > Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:46:32 +0100
 > 
 >  On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:20:56PM +0100, Peter Postma wrote:
 >  > Good, I've committed it.
 >  > Is it ok to close the PR or do you want to test it more?
 >  
 >  From my point of view the PR can be closed. I've implemented some
 >  rdr rules for the fixed address and some filter rules for outgoing
 >  traffic with certain criteria and everything seems to be working fine.
 >  
 >  Can you say anything about the panic I mentioned? Could it be related?
 >  
 >  If anything else pops up I'll give a shout.
 >  
 >  Thanks again
 >  
 
 I'm not sure if the panic is related, but I've seen similar panics on
 the lists (but that was also related to SACK).
 
 Can you please file a new PR (with traceback) when the panic happens again?
 
 Thanks,
 -- 
 Peter Postma