Subject: Re: port-i386/31494
To: None <port-i386-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 10/12/2005 18:33:02
The following reply was made to PR port-i386/31494; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-i386-maintainer@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
	netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-i386/31494
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:32:49 +0200

 On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:30:02AM +0000, Eric Gendron wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR port-i386/31494; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Eric Gendron <ericg@conceptid.ca>
 > To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: port-i386/31494
 > Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:29:37 -0400
 > 
 >  I've compiled netbsd withoud esiop and siop with MP support from 3.0beta
 >  CVS.  Seems to work since 15 minutes.
 >  
 >  But I think it shouldn't crash with GENERIC.MP anyway!
 
 I looked at adding a timeout to the (s)siop reset code. But it adds
 too much code (and possible bugs) for a workaround for something that
 has to be fixed anyway.
 
 >  
 >  It's ok for me cause I really don't care about the on-board scsi
 >  interface at all.
 >  
 >  The interrupt shouldn't be the same, I verified in BIOS and at startup.
 >  I think it's about one of the options in specific GENERIC.MP file?
 
 Yes. either PCIBIOS or ACPI. Did you try the GENERIC.MPACPI kernel config ?
 
 -- 
 Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
      NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
 --