Subject: Re: misc/31139
To: None <rpaulo@netbsd.org>
From: Tetsuya Isaki <isaki@par.odn.ne.jp>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 09/06/2005 14:52:56
At Mon,  5 Sep 2005 18:22:28 +0000 (UTC),
rpaulo@netbsd.org wrote:
> 
> Synopsis: bpf(4) does not describe some ioctls
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: rpaulo@netbsd.org
> State-Changed-When: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:22:27 +0000
> State-Changed-Why:
> Please provide me feedback on the change, thanks!

Good.
and I have a comment. A term of two 'header' appeared in
this manpage -- 'bpf header' and 'network layer header'.
So how about this?

--- bpf.4.org   2005-09-06 14:10:53.000000000 +0900
+++ bpf.4       2005-09-06 14:34:11.000000000 +0900
@@ -293,7 +293,8 @@
 Enable/disable or get the
 .Dq header complete
 flag status.
-If enabled, packets written to the bpf file descriptor will not have headers
+If enabled, packets written to the bpf file descriptor will not have
+network layer headers
 rewritten in the interface output routine.
 By default, the flag is disabled (value is 0).
 .It Dv BIOCGSEESENT BIOCSSEESENT (u_int)


Anyway, Thanks for your quick work!
---
Tetsuya Isaki <isaki@par.odn.ne.jp>