Subject: Re: kern/15364
To: None <chs@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 08/30/2005 01:54:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/15364; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
To: chuq@chuq.com
Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/15364
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:53:22 +0900
> well, I was thinking it would be good to have the property that a given block
> is written in one I/O, since that's what the softdep code was designed for,
> and it'd be safer to maintain the assumptions that the softdep code makes.
> but you're probably right that it's not really required.
while block-alignment might have good aspects,
it can confuse pagedaemon and increase number of i/o
if both of active and inactive pages are in a block.
i'm not sure if it affects real-world performance, tho.
> would you like to
> implement your bitmap idea?
i will.
YAMAMOTO Takashi