Subject: Re: toolchain/30842: fails with mksh
To: None <,,>
From: Alan Barrett <>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 07/27/2005 07:20:02
The following reply was made to PR toolchain/30842; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alan Barrett <>
Subject: Re: toolchain/30842: fails with mksh
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:16:41 +0200

 On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Martin Husemann wrote:
 > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:13:31PM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
 > > Can we solve this problem without adding more special cases to
 > > by just adding backslashes in appropriate places, so it doesn't matter
 > > whether or not the shell does brace expansion?
 > Doesn't this mean this shell is broken from a posix point of view
 Yes, I think so, but I thought we could work around it.  I was wrong.
 > and with your change should fail on a strictly confirming
 > shell?
 I don't know what POSIX says, but all the shells I tested failed.
 > IIUC in this case the rules for double quotes apply:
 >   The backslash shall retain its special meaning as an escape character [..]
 >   only when followed by one of the following characters when considered
 >   special:
 >        $   `   "   \   <newline>
 The sh(1) man page says
      the text is subjected to parameter expansion, command substitution,
      and arithmetic expansion (as described in the section on
 without mentioning anything about backslashes.  But testing several shells
 available to me shows that they all treat \{ literally.  So my idea won't
 work in practice, regardless of what POSIX says.
 --apb (Alan Barrett)