Subject: Re: lib/30664: realpath and magic symlinks
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/08/2005 16:57:25
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:35:29AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Chuck Silvers wrote:
> >I think that the real problem is having the path interpretation be =20
> >for symlinks vs. other path lookups done in the kernel. it would make
> >a lot more sense to have the tranlation done for all pathname lookups
> >or none, and not this awkward halfway thing that "magic symlinks" =20
> >then readlink() would be fine as it is.
> So, the question is:
> Are these magic names interpreted by lookup() before handing them off =20
> to VFS_LOOKUP()? I would guess it would have to be, otherwise it =20
> would just be insane.
My thought is to keep the processing in namei(). Just change it so that=20
rather than looking at a path passed from a symlink (i.e. after lookup()=20
returns), we look at all paths before we call lookup().
I realize that this change would require magicname handling to be=20
system-wide rather than per-mountpoint. I think that's fine. After all,=20
the semantics are system-wide.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----