Subject: Re: port-xen/29887: sysctl kern.consdev coredumps
To: None <port-xen-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 06/20/2005 18:31:02
The following reply was made to PR port-xen/29887; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org,
tech-userlevel@NetBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: port-xen/29887: sysctl kern.consdev coredumps
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:27:13 -0400 (EDT)
> GCC already has -ffreestanding to suppress this behavior. If you're
> not freestanding, you're hosted, so there is no need for any other
> option.
I don't get it. You're saying that every hosted environment has
exactly the same set of extensions to standard libraries - the same set
of additional provisions, of semantics defined in cases where the
standard is silent or specifies undefined behaviour?
I can't really make myself believe that; you know better.
But if not, I don't see how you get to the "there is no need..."
conclusion from that premise.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B