Subject: Re: kern/26043
To: Konrad Schroder <perseant@hhhh.org>
From: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 04/04/2005 21:02:01
At 9:35 Uhr -0800 28.3.2005, Konrad Schroder wrote:
>On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Hauke Fath wrote:
>
>>> My tests on a dual SS-10 with a current kernel don't panic.  I haven't
>>> verified the panic without the patch, but it is clear in the code.
>>
>> Would I need a -current kernel for verifying that, or does a netbsd-3
>> kernel suffice? My ss10 is running 2.0 stable.
>
>Right now the fix is only on -current, though I'll package it up for
>netbsd-3 shortly.  The fix for this case is rev 1.140 of
>sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c , which pulls up to the netbsd-3 branch without
>difficulty; or if you like you can wait for me and releng a bit, and test
>again once it's in the branch :^)

I have brought the Sun to 3.0beta in the meantime, and with the union-mount
setup described in the PR (/var/obj on a 4.4lfs partition) have built a
kernel and x11/openmotif without any problems.

In short: I consider the problem fixed.

Thanks for working on this,

	hauke


--
/~\  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ /    No HTML/RTF in email
 X     No Word docs in email
/ \  Respect for open standards