On Mar 28,  9:35am, perseant@hhhh.org (Konrad Schroder) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: kern/26043

| On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Hauke Fath wrote:
| 
| >> My tests on a dual SS-10 with a current kernel don't panic.  I haven't
| >> verified the panic without the patch, but it is clear in the code.
| >
| > Would I need a -current kernel for verifying that, or does a netbsd-3
| > kernel suffice? My ss10 is running 2.0 stable.
| 
| Right now the fix is only on -current, though I'll package it up for 
| netbsd-3 shortly.  The fix for this case is rev 1.140 of 
| sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c , which pulls up to the netbsd-3 branch without 
| difficulty; or if you like you can wait for me and releng a bit, and test 
| again once it's in the branch :^)
| 

Pullup lfs_debug.c while you are at it, otherwise the build fails with
-DDDEBUG in lkm.

christos