Subject: Re: kern/26043
To: Konrad Schroder <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/28/2005 12:47:33
On Mar 28, 9:35am, email@example.com (Konrad Schroder) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: kern/26043
| On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Hauke Fath wrote:
| >> My tests on a dual SS-10 with a current kernel don't panic. I haven't
| >> verified the panic without the patch, but it is clear in the code.
| > Would I need a -current kernel for verifying that, or does a netbsd-3
| > kernel suffice? My ss10 is running 2.0 stable.
| Right now the fix is only on -current, though I'll package it up for
| netbsd-3 shortly. The fix for this case is rev 1.140 of
| sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c , which pulls up to the netbsd-3 branch without
| difficulty; or if you like you can wait for me and releng a bit, and test
| again once it's in the branch :^)
Pullup lfs_debug.c while you are at it, otherwise the build fails with
-DDDEBUG in lkm.